Excerpt:
Kenya National Male Circumcision task force and players in the
Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision have launched a pilot study to lure
men within 24-49 years to circumcision. The initiative is aimed at
circumcising male adults.
The awareness will start at greater Nyando before being rolled out to
other parts of the region. The initiative will also provide food
incentives, cash and shopping vouchers to families of those willing to
be circumcised to entice more men to be circumcised.
Archived URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6IMrKH0CD
Thursday, 1 October 2015
2012-07-13 The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe) - "Were we fooled?"
Excerpt:
Archived URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6LtwhZhpQ
Dozens of billboards emblazoned with the message “Circumcision — one of the top defenders against HIV and Aids” are now a common sight on major roads in Harare.
Such loud advertisements, alongside an aggressive campaign in newspapers and on air, form part of a multi-million-dollar campaign aimed at encouraging sexually active men to get circumcised as a way of reducing the risk of contracting HIV.
Recently, Members of the House of Assembly and leading celebrities were roped into the campaign to try and encourage more men within the 15 and 49 age group to get circumcised.
...
However, what is clear to many is that circumcised youths have turned to sexually risky behaviour in the false belief that circumcision gives them an “invisible condom”.
Others are of the view that Africa might have been sold a ruse by the WHO in cahoots with Western researchers.
Archived URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6LtwhZhpQ
2013-11-10 ZimEye - "Zimbabwe Buys Into Controversial Israeli Style Circumcision"
Excerpt:
Archived URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6LvHdFdC2
At at time when government is struggling to provide bath and drink water for women in maternity wards across the country, the Ministry of Health and Child Care (MoHCC) has embarked on an expensive and controversial Israeli style pilot programme to circumcise young boys a few days after being born under the hope of stopping the spread of HIV AIDS.
...
The ministry’s program will see over 500 babies between the ages of 10 and 60 days in Harare being circumcised voluntarily at the government’s own expense.
The state media reports that the programme is meant to assist Government in determining the best age at which to start conducting male circumcision, which is said to reduce the likelihood of contracting HIV by approximately 60percent albeit amid protest from other independent practitioners that this is untrue.
Archived URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6LvHdFdC2
Wednesday, 30 September 2015
2011 - Written Evidence in response to Health Committee Public Health Inquiry
SUMMARY:
There has been a concerted effort in the professional literature, from a small cabal within the medical fraternity, to argue the case for reinstating non-therapeutic circumcision at the expense of the NHS, frequently using professed concern for the well-being of boys of certain ethnic or religious backgrounds receiving circumcision in non-medical settings, as a pretext.
Recently, there has been a string of mainstream media items favourable to male circumcision, which amount to nothing less than a marketing campaign to motivate parents to have their sons circumcised. Many of these articles draw upon established marketing concepts (in turn derived from insights of behavoiural science), most notably, the use of “experts”. In the context of promoting circumcision to parents, such “experts” generally include medical practitioners who work at private circumcision clinics and religious officials.
Regardless of whether it is performed in a medical or non-medical setting, a significant number of boys subjected to the practice of circumcision will later fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive parts of a boy’s penis, including the foreskin, the frenulum, and the ridged band of nerves. The male foreskin is also designed to protect the glans of the penis throughout a man’s life, ensuring that the internal mucosal tissue remains moist and sensitive (much the same way that a woman’s clitoral hood protects the clitoris). In addition, the foreskin acts as a natural gliding mechanism to reduce chafing and dryness during intercourse.
The British Medical Association advises against routine male circumcision, and no national medical association in the world recommends that boys be forcefully circumcised for preventive health reasons.
There has been little incentive for the medical profession to investigate the long-term affects on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being, but the growth of groups such as NORM-UK (an organisation registered with the Charities Commissioners for England and Wales), suggests that a substantial number of men genuinely resent being circumcised.
It is imperative that Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that all staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs and GP practices: Must not offer among their services the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not permit on their premises individuals or organisations promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be refer patients explicitly for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be employed or associated with any facility offering the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not allow their facilities to be used for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.; and Must not stock or allow on their premises literature or other material promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
Given the dearth of research in this area, it would be appropriate for the Department of Health and Public Health England to partner with registered charities such as NORM-UK and to create incentives for medical researchers to investigate the long-term affects of circumcision on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being.
1. There has been a concerted effort in the professional literature, from a small cabal within the medical fraternity, to argue the case for reinstating non-therapeutic circumcision at the expense of the NHS, frequently using professed concern for the well-being of boys of certain ethnic or religious backgrounds receiving circumcision in non-medical settings, as a pretext [1], a call loudly echoed in sections of the mainstream media [2]. Regardless of whether it is performed in a medical or non-medical setting, a significant number of boys subjected to the practice of circumcision will later fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder [3]. Further, circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive parts of a boy’s penis, including the foreskin, the frenulum, and the ridged band of nerves [4]. The male foreskin is also designed to protect the glans of the penis throughout a man’s life, ensuring that the internal mucosal tissue remains moist and sensitive (much the same way that a woman’s clitoral hood protects the clitoris). In addition, the foreskin acts as a natural gliding mechanism to reduce chafing and dryness during intercourse [5].
2. Recently, there has been a string of mainstream media items favourable to male circumcision, which amount to nothing less than a marketing campaign to motivate parents to have their sons circumcised [2,6,7,8]. Many of these articles draw upon established marketing concepts (in turn derived from insights of behavoiural science), most notably, the use of “experts”. An “expert”, in a marketing context, is an individual who, because of their occupation, or perceived experience, is uniquely placed to lend credence to the product or service that an advertisement promotes [9]. In the context of promoting circumcision to parents, such “experts” generally include medical practitioners who work at private circumcision clinics [6,8] and religious officials [7]. Following complaints from the public, the Press Complaints Commission has reached resolutions noting the inappropriate implication in media items that religious officials are qualified to offer medical advice in regard to circumcision, the minimisation of the inherent risks of circumcision as a medical procedure, and the implication that circumcision is of minimal discomfort through the impression that it is legitimate practice to conduct the procedure without anaesthesia [10,11]. Both the hospital and doctor (who is also a Consultant Urological Surgeon at Royal Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust) featured in a recent episode of the Channel 4 television series Embarrassing Bodies [8], linked to the video on the Channel 4 website from their respective web-pages [12,13], effectively by-passing the General Medical Council Guidelines about how medical practitioners should promote and publish information about their services [14]. It is unsurprising that such symbiotic relationships should form between private doctors seeking to promote their practice and mainstream media outlets who want to appease advertisers by keeping such a high-profile controversial social issue alive, since advertising is the force which has historically sustained all commercial media [15].
3. The British Medical Association advises against routine male circumcision [16], and no national medical association in the world recommends that boys be forcefully circumcised for preventive health reasons. The Royal Dutch Medical Association's very up-to-date policy on circumcision states that "KNMG is calling upon doctors to actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications", and that there is a good case for making it illegal [17]. Female genital mutilation has been illegal for a number of years now [18]. There has been little incentive for the medical profession to investigate the long-term affects on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being, but the growth of groups such as NORM-UK (an organisation registered with the Charities Commissioners for England and Wales), suggests that a substantial number of men genuinely resent being circumcised [19].
4. A recent statement from the British Association of Paediatric Urologists on behalf of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons and The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists admitted that some doctor's under it's charge “have been willing to provide non therapeutic circumcision without charge rather than risk the procedure being carried out in unhygienic conditions.” [20]. In it's statement on the law and ethics of male circumcision, the British Medical Association has concluded that “it is for society to decide what limits should be imposed on parental choices.” [16].
5. It is therefore imperative that Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that all staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs and GP practices: Must not offer among their services the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not permit on their premises individuals or organisations promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be refer patients explicitly for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be employed or associated with any facility offering the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not allow their facilities to be used for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.; and Must not stock or allow on their premises literature or other material promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
6. To best develop and enhance the availability, accessibility and utility of public health information and intelligence regarding the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, it is imperative that the Department of Health and Public Health England establish a central information store of the harm caused by male circumcision, which will form the basis for establishing a dictate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under it's auspices, including GPs and GP practices, will not perform nor refer patients for circumcision; and to make use of the insights of behavioural science to research and implement strategies which discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
7. To counteract the mainstream media marketing of circumcision to parents, it is appropriate that the Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under it's auspices, including GPs and GP practices, will not perform nor refer patients for circumcision; and should use the insights of behavioural science to research and implement strategies which discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
8. It would be appropriate to invite appropriately registered charity organisations such as NORM-UK to partner with the Department of Health and Public Health England to contribute to compiling and improving the use of public health evidence to counteract the mainstream media marketing of circumcision to parents and discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
9. Given questions raised about the professional conduct of some medical practitioners with regard to the continuing practice of male circumcision, whatever system of voluntary regulation may be implemented, it is appropriate that the Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs, GP practices and other public health specialists, will not perform nor refer patients for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
10. Given the dearth of research in this area, it would be appropriate for the Department of Health and Public Health England to create incentives for medical researchers to investigate the long-term affects of circumcision on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being.
11. Links/References:
1. Paranthaman K., Bagaria, J & O'Moore, E. (2010) The need for commissioning circumcision services for non-therapeutic indications in the NHS: lessons from an incident investigation in Oxford J Public Health first published online July 14, 2010 http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/07/14/pubmed.fdq053.full
2. Campbell, D. (2010) NHS urged to offer circumcisions to avoid botched operations in The Guardian Sunday 11 July 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jul/11/doctors-urge-circumcision-on-nhs
3. Samuel Ramos and Gregory J. Boyle. Ritual and Medical Circumcision among Filipino boys: Evidence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Humanities & Social Sciences papers (2000). Available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=hss_pubs
4. Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss, Christopher Eden, Marilyn F. Milos, Norma Wilcox, Robert S. Van Howe Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis British Journal of Urology International, Volume 99 Issue 4 Page 864 – 869 April 2007 http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf
5. Taylor, J.P., A.P. Lockwood and A.J.Taylor The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision Journal of Urology (1996), 77, 291-295 http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
6. Renton, A. (2010) It protects men (and women) against fatal diseases and sexual infections. So, should all boys be circumcised? in TheDaily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1199472/It-protects-men-women-fatal-diseases-sexual-infections-So-boys-circumcised.html
7. Rich, B. (2010) To snip or not to snip? in The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/oct/30/circumcision-jewish-son-ben-rich
8. Channel 4 (2011) Embarrassing Bodies Series 4 Episode 4 http://www.channel4.com/programmes/embarrassing-bodies/episode-guide/series-4/episode-4
9. Schiffman, L Bednell, D O’Cass, A Paladino, A Kanuk, L (2005) Consumer Behaviour 3rd Edition Pearson Education Australia, Australia: Frenchs Forest
10. Press Complaints Commission (2011) Parkes vs The Guardian http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=NjkxNg==
11. Press Complaints Commission (2010) Warren vs Daily Mail http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=NjIyNA==
12. http://www.spirehealthcare.com/Liverpool/Our-Facilities-Treatments-and-Consultants/Our-Treatments/Adult-circumcision/
13. http://www.spirehealthcare.com/Liverpool/Our-Facilities-Treatments-and-Consultants/Our-Consultants/Mr-P-Cornford/
14. General Medical Council (2011) Good Medical Practice: Providing and publishing information about your services http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/probity_information_about_services.asp
15. Cunningham, S & Turner, G (2002) The Media & Communications in Australia Allen & Unwin, Australia
16. British Medical Association. The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors. London: BMA, 2006 http://www.bma.org.uk/ethics/consent_and_capacity/malecircumcision2006.jsp
17. KNMG (2010) Non-theraputic circumcision of male minors http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976
18. LASSL (2004)4: Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, DoH, published 27.2.2004
19. http://www.norm-uk.org/
20. British Association of Paediatric Urologists (2007) MANAGEMENT OF FORESKIN CONDITIONS Statement from the British Association of Paediatric Urologists on behalf of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons and The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists. http://www.apagbi.org.uk/sites/apagbi.org.uk/files/circumcision2007.pdf
There has been a concerted effort in the professional literature, from a small cabal within the medical fraternity, to argue the case for reinstating non-therapeutic circumcision at the expense of the NHS, frequently using professed concern for the well-being of boys of certain ethnic or religious backgrounds receiving circumcision in non-medical settings, as a pretext.
Recently, there has been a string of mainstream media items favourable to male circumcision, which amount to nothing less than a marketing campaign to motivate parents to have their sons circumcised. Many of these articles draw upon established marketing concepts (in turn derived from insights of behavoiural science), most notably, the use of “experts”. In the context of promoting circumcision to parents, such “experts” generally include medical practitioners who work at private circumcision clinics and religious officials.
Regardless of whether it is performed in a medical or non-medical setting, a significant number of boys subjected to the practice of circumcision will later fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive parts of a boy’s penis, including the foreskin, the frenulum, and the ridged band of nerves. The male foreskin is also designed to protect the glans of the penis throughout a man’s life, ensuring that the internal mucosal tissue remains moist and sensitive (much the same way that a woman’s clitoral hood protects the clitoris). In addition, the foreskin acts as a natural gliding mechanism to reduce chafing and dryness during intercourse.
The British Medical Association advises against routine male circumcision, and no national medical association in the world recommends that boys be forcefully circumcised for preventive health reasons.
There has been little incentive for the medical profession to investigate the long-term affects on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being, but the growth of groups such as NORM-UK (an organisation registered with the Charities Commissioners for England and Wales), suggests that a substantial number of men genuinely resent being circumcised.
It is imperative that Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that all staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs and GP practices: Must not offer among their services the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not permit on their premises individuals or organisations promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be refer patients explicitly for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be employed or associated with any facility offering the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not allow their facilities to be used for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.; and Must not stock or allow on their premises literature or other material promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
Given the dearth of research in this area, it would be appropriate for the Department of Health and Public Health England to partner with registered charities such as NORM-UK and to create incentives for medical researchers to investigate the long-term affects of circumcision on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being.
1. There has been a concerted effort in the professional literature, from a small cabal within the medical fraternity, to argue the case for reinstating non-therapeutic circumcision at the expense of the NHS, frequently using professed concern for the well-being of boys of certain ethnic or religious backgrounds receiving circumcision in non-medical settings, as a pretext [1], a call loudly echoed in sections of the mainstream media [2]. Regardless of whether it is performed in a medical or non-medical setting, a significant number of boys subjected to the practice of circumcision will later fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder [3]. Further, circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive parts of a boy’s penis, including the foreskin, the frenulum, and the ridged band of nerves [4]. The male foreskin is also designed to protect the glans of the penis throughout a man’s life, ensuring that the internal mucosal tissue remains moist and sensitive (much the same way that a woman’s clitoral hood protects the clitoris). In addition, the foreskin acts as a natural gliding mechanism to reduce chafing and dryness during intercourse [5].
2. Recently, there has been a string of mainstream media items favourable to male circumcision, which amount to nothing less than a marketing campaign to motivate parents to have their sons circumcised [2,6,7,8]. Many of these articles draw upon established marketing concepts (in turn derived from insights of behavoiural science), most notably, the use of “experts”. An “expert”, in a marketing context, is an individual who, because of their occupation, or perceived experience, is uniquely placed to lend credence to the product or service that an advertisement promotes [9]. In the context of promoting circumcision to parents, such “experts” generally include medical practitioners who work at private circumcision clinics [6,8] and religious officials [7]. Following complaints from the public, the Press Complaints Commission has reached resolutions noting the inappropriate implication in media items that religious officials are qualified to offer medical advice in regard to circumcision, the minimisation of the inherent risks of circumcision as a medical procedure, and the implication that circumcision is of minimal discomfort through the impression that it is legitimate practice to conduct the procedure without anaesthesia [10,11]. Both the hospital and doctor (who is also a Consultant Urological Surgeon at Royal Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust) featured in a recent episode of the Channel 4 television series Embarrassing Bodies [8], linked to the video on the Channel 4 website from their respective web-pages [12,13], effectively by-passing the General Medical Council Guidelines about how medical practitioners should promote and publish information about their services [14]. It is unsurprising that such symbiotic relationships should form between private doctors seeking to promote their practice and mainstream media outlets who want to appease advertisers by keeping such a high-profile controversial social issue alive, since advertising is the force which has historically sustained all commercial media [15].
3. The British Medical Association advises against routine male circumcision [16], and no national medical association in the world recommends that boys be forcefully circumcised for preventive health reasons. The Royal Dutch Medical Association's very up-to-date policy on circumcision states that "KNMG is calling upon doctors to actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications", and that there is a good case for making it illegal [17]. Female genital mutilation has been illegal for a number of years now [18]. There has been little incentive for the medical profession to investigate the long-term affects on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being, but the growth of groups such as NORM-UK (an organisation registered with the Charities Commissioners for England and Wales), suggests that a substantial number of men genuinely resent being circumcised [19].
4. A recent statement from the British Association of Paediatric Urologists on behalf of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons and The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists admitted that some doctor's under it's charge “have been willing to provide non therapeutic circumcision without charge rather than risk the procedure being carried out in unhygienic conditions.” [20]. In it's statement on the law and ethics of male circumcision, the British Medical Association has concluded that “it is for society to decide what limits should be imposed on parental choices.” [16].
5. It is therefore imperative that Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that all staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs and GP practices: Must not offer among their services the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not permit on their premises individuals or organisations promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be refer patients explicitly for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not be employed or associated with any facility offering the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision; Must not allow their facilities to be used for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.; and Must not stock or allow on their premises literature or other material promoting the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
6. To best develop and enhance the availability, accessibility and utility of public health information and intelligence regarding the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, it is imperative that the Department of Health and Public Health England establish a central information store of the harm caused by male circumcision, which will form the basis for establishing a dictate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under it's auspices, including GPs and GP practices, will not perform nor refer patients for circumcision; and to make use of the insights of behavioural science to research and implement strategies which discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
7. To counteract the mainstream media marketing of circumcision to parents, it is appropriate that the Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under it's auspices, including GPs and GP practices, will not perform nor refer patients for circumcision; and should use the insights of behavioural science to research and implement strategies which discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
8. It would be appropriate to invite appropriately registered charity organisations such as NORM-UK to partner with the Department of Health and Public Health England to contribute to compiling and improving the use of public health evidence to counteract the mainstream media marketing of circumcision to parents and discourage parents from subjecting their sons to the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision, without lending to it's prestige by implying that it is a practice worthy of it's own policy statement or the subject of a legitimate 'debate'.
9. Given questions raised about the professional conduct of some medical practitioners with regard to the continuing practice of male circumcision, whatever system of voluntary regulation may be implemented, it is appropriate that the Department of Health and Public Health England mandate that staff, contractors, agencies, facilities and departments under their auspices, including GPs, GP practices and other public health specialists, will not perform nor refer patients for the harmful male genital mutilation known as circumcision.
10. Given the dearth of research in this area, it would be appropriate for the Department of Health and Public Health England to create incentives for medical researchers to investigate the long-term affects of circumcision on men's sexual and psychological health and well-being.
11. Links/References:
1. Paranthaman K., Bagaria, J & O'Moore, E. (2010) The need for commissioning circumcision services for non-therapeutic indications in the NHS: lessons from an incident investigation in Oxford J Public Health first published online July 14, 2010 http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/07/14/pubmed.fdq053.full
2. Campbell, D. (2010) NHS urged to offer circumcisions to avoid botched operations in The Guardian Sunday 11 July 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jul/11/doctors-urge-circumcision-on-nhs
3. Samuel Ramos and Gregory J. Boyle. Ritual and Medical Circumcision among Filipino boys: Evidence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Humanities & Social Sciences papers (2000). Available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=hss_pubs
4. Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss, Christopher Eden, Marilyn F. Milos, Norma Wilcox, Robert S. Van Howe Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis British Journal of Urology International, Volume 99 Issue 4 Page 864 – 869 April 2007 http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf
5. Taylor, J.P., A.P. Lockwood and A.J.Taylor The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision Journal of Urology (1996), 77, 291-295 http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
6. Renton, A. (2010) It protects men (and women) against fatal diseases and sexual infections. So, should all boys be circumcised? in TheDaily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1199472/It-protects-men-women-fatal-diseases-sexual-infections-So-boys-circumcised.html
7. Rich, B. (2010) To snip or not to snip? in The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/oct/30/circumcision-jewish-son-ben-rich
8. Channel 4 (2011) Embarrassing Bodies Series 4 Episode 4 http://www.channel4.com/programmes/embarrassing-bodies/episode-guide/series-4/episode-4
9. Schiffman, L Bednell, D O’Cass, A Paladino, A Kanuk, L (2005) Consumer Behaviour 3rd Edition Pearson Education Australia, Australia: Frenchs Forest
10. Press Complaints Commission (2011) Parkes vs The Guardian http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=NjkxNg==
11. Press Complaints Commission (2010) Warren vs Daily Mail http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=NjIyNA==
12. http://www.spirehealthcare.com/Liverpool/Our-Facilities-Treatments-and-Consultants/Our-Treatments/Adult-circumcision/
13. http://www.spirehealthcare.com/Liverpool/Our-Facilities-Treatments-and-Consultants/Our-Consultants/Mr-P-Cornford/
14. General Medical Council (2011) Good Medical Practice: Providing and publishing information about your services http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/probity_information_about_services.asp
15. Cunningham, S & Turner, G (2002) The Media & Communications in Australia Allen & Unwin, Australia
16. British Medical Association. The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors. London: BMA, 2006 http://www.bma.org.uk/ethics/consent_and_capacity/malecircumcision2006.jsp
17. KNMG (2010) Non-theraputic circumcision of male minors http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976
18. LASSL (2004)4: Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, DoH, published 27.2.2004
19. http://www.norm-uk.org/
20. British Association of Paediatric Urologists (2007) MANAGEMENT OF FORESKIN CONDITIONS Statement from the British Association of Paediatric Urologists on behalf of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons and The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists. http://www.apagbi.org.uk/sites/apagbi.org.uk/files/circumcision2007.pdf
Tuesday, 29 September 2015
2013 - Response to “PEPFAR Program Expenditures” [Form Number: DS-4213, OMB Control Number: 1405-0208]
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback to “PEPFAR Program Expenditures” [Form Number: DS-4213, OMB Control Number: 1405-0208]. This response document will briefly address concerns about the ethical, legal and methodological flaws with past research informing aspects of present PEPFAR program areas; concerns about adverse consequences of PEPFAR program areas; and concerns about the absence of oversight of the activities of PEPFAR funding recipients.
Ethical, Legal and Methodological Flaws with Past Research informing present PEPFAR Program Areas
In 2011 and 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General [OIG] published a series of audit reports revealing that throughout fiscal years 2000-2010, the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases [NIAID], did not comply with the time and amount requirements specified in appropriations statutes, in awarding several federal contracts to commercial partners, committing the federal government to tens of millions of dollars of expenditure ahead of appropriation of funds from Congress (OIG 2011a; OIG 2011b; OIG 2011c; OIG 2011d; OIG 2012a; OIG 2012b). During this time, NIAID also funded and sponsored research conducted abroad, that would be unlikely to receive ethical approval to be conducted in the United States, incorporating the excision of healthy tissue from subjects in the absence of a clear and present immediate medical indication, specifically ClinicalTrials.gov registered trials NCT00059371 and NCT00425984 ['the African circumcision trials'] (NIH 2008; NIH 2007), the methodology, conclusions, ethics and legality of which have been questioned in the professional medical literature (Boyle & Hill 2011; Green et al 2010). In the years following publication of the African circumcision trials, regulatory agencies under the aegis of the Department of Health and Human Services have moved to strengthen protections afforded human research subjects and to increase the rigor with which trials conducted abroad are assessed as a basis for seeking approval of new drugs and medical devices in the U.S. market (FDA 2012; OHRP 2011), although concerns continue to be raised about the capability of National Institutes of Health [NIH] Data and Safety Monitoring Boards to ensure the safety of study subjects and validity and integrity of the data for clinical trials (OIG 2013a).
Adverse Consequences of PEPFAR Program Funding Areas
Despite the concerns identified above, the results of the African circumcision trials continue to be used to justify the en masse circumcision of men in Africa using PEPFAR funds and to justify the circumcision of boys and male infants - both in the United States and abroad - in the absence of clear and present immediate medical indications, and in the latter instance, with the tacit endorsement of U.S. government agencies in receipt of PEPFAR program funding (CDC 2011; Llewellyn 2012). In the wake of PEPFAR funding for mass circumcision programs in Africa, human rights organisations and local media in the region have reported coercion of men and boys to be circumcised (AFP 2012; Ahlberg & Njoroge 2013; Aluru 2013; Amnesty International 2013; Chibaya 2013a; Chibaya 2013b; Chirombo 2013; Dube 2012; Echwala 2013; Handable 2013; Hatyoka 2013; Langa 2012; Layoo 2013; Mbanje 2013; Mhlanga 2012; News24 2013; Ngwega 2012; Okwii 2013; Onyango 2012; Otieno 2013; Towindo 2012) and misdirection of limited medical resources from other priority areas to male circumcision (AHN 2012; Gonzalez 2012; ZimEye 2013).
Absence of Oversight
On the 15 June 2011, the OIG published a report critical of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's [CDC's] failure to oversee recipientss use of PEPFAR funds, concluding that the “lack of required documentation demonstrates that CDC has not exercised proper stewardship over Federal PEPFAR funds because it did not consistently follow departmental and other Federal requirements in monitoring PEPFAR recipients” (OIG 2011e). Further investigations by the OIG have also revealed specific failures of the CDC to monitor recipients use of PEPFAR funds in Namibia (OIG 2013c; OIG 2013d) and South Africa (OIG 2013b; OIG 2013e; OIG 2013f; OIG 2013g). In 2013, the OIG also published a report critical of the CDC's failure to oversee use of PEPFAR funds by the Vietnam Administration for HIV/AIDS Control (OIG 2013h), suggesting the possibility that more systemic problems may exist within the CDC, impacting the agency's ability to effectively oversee the activities of grantees in receipt of federal funds, and that this is not specific to difficulty with oversight of grantees in the African region.
Conclusion
Valid concerns exist about the ethical, legal and methodological flaws with past research informing aspects of present PEPFAR program areas; adverse consequences of PEPFAR program areas; and the absence of oversight of the activities of PEPFAR funding recipients. It is therefore imperative that full and complete disclosure and oversight in the proposed information collection activity take precedence over the CDC's and PEPFAR funding recipients' professed concerns for increased regulatory and administrative 'burden'.
References
AFP (2012) US urges circumcision for soldiers to fight HIV in Africa Yahoo! Health http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/afp/us-urges-circumcision-for-soldiers-to-fight-hiv-in-africa Accessed: 2012-06-17. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68Trj7ABp
Ahlberg BM, Njoroge KM (2013) 'Not men enough to rule!': politicization of ethnicities and forcible circumcision of Luo men during the postelection violence in Kenya Ethn Health. 2013 Oct;18(5):454-68. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2013.772326. Epub 2013 Jun 11 Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758644
AHN (2012) HIV services in western refugee camps overwhelmed Gant Daily 29 March 2012 http://gantdaily.com/2012/03/29/hiv-services-in-western-refugee-camps-overwhelmed/
Aluru L (2013) Siaya County seeks forced male ‘cut’ law 2 October 2013 Standard Digital News http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/?articleID=2000094743&story_title=Kenya-county-seeks-forced-male-cut-law Accessed: 2013-12-15. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LtnVPjiW
Amnesty International (2013) Kenya’s ICC trials Amnesty International website 16 September 2013 Amnesty International website http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/kenya-s-icc-trials-2013-09-16 Accessed: 2013-12-15. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LtoCK3gQ
Boyle GJ, Hill G (2011) Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: methodological, ethical and legal concerns J Law Med. 2011 Dec;19(2):316-34 Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22320006
CDC (2011) Trends in In-Hospital Newborn Male Circumcision - United States 1999-2010 Prepared by Xinjian Zhang, PhD, Sanjyot Shinde, PhD, Peter H Kilmarx, MD, Robert T Chen, MD, Div of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; Shanna Cox, MSPH, Lee Warner, PhD, Div of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Maria Owings, PhD, Div of Healthcare Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics; Charbel El Bcheraoui, PhD, EIS Officer, CDC. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Full-text available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6034a4.htm?s_cid=mm6034a4_w
Chibaya, M (2013a) Resistance hinders circumcision programme The Standard Full-text available at http://www.thestandard.co.zw/2013/05/19/resistance-hinders-circumcision-programme/ Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ltky3cRF
Chibaya, M (2013b) Winky D tackles circumcision controversy New Zimbabwe 21 October 2013 Accessed: 2013-12-15. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LtoaHGyi
Chirombo, S (2013) Malawi: Kasungu Registers Low Turnout for Male Circumcision allAfrica.com 5 July 2013 Accessed: 2013-07-08. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6HxNQ2VYn
Dube, C (2012) F/town adult males spurn circumcision The Monitor 21 May 2012 http://www.mmegi.bw/index.php?sid=1&aid=370&dir=2012/May/Monday21 Accessed: 2012-06-17. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68TqWHbxL
Echwala, E (2013) Zimbabwe's circumcision drive fails to take off IRIN News 9 July 2013 http://www.irinnews.org/report/98379/zimbabwe-s-circumcision-drive-fails-to-take-off Accessed: 2013-12-15. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ltn5kJBC
FDA (2012) FDA's HSP/BIMO Initiative Accomplishments: Update May 2012 Food and Drug Administration Full-text available at http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RunningClinicalTrials/ucm305275.htm Accessed: 2012-06-10. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68JLjWhEP
Gonzalez L L (2012) Africa: Less Global Funds, More Problems allAfrica 10 May 2012 Full-text available at http://allafrica.com/stories/201205110671.html
Green LW, Travis JW, McAllister RG, Peterson KW, Vardanyan AN, Craig A (2010) Male circumcision and HIV prevention insufficient evidence and neglected external validity Am J Prev Med. 2010 Nov;39(5):479-82 Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20965388
Handable, N (2013) Zambia: Women Should Encourage Their Partners allAfrica.com http://allafrica.com/stories/201211201412.html Accessed: 2013-12-16. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LvIDW2pt
Hatyoka, B (2013) ‘Sensitise subjects on male circumcision’ Times of Zambia 22 May 2013 Accessed: 2013-12-15. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LtlPFBWm
Langa, V (2012) 175 MPs to be circumcised News Day 18 May 2012 http://www.newsday.co.zw/article/2012-05-18-175-mps-to-be-circumcised/ Accessed: 2012-06-17. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68Tqz9L2u
Layoo, R (2013) Former inmates decry forced circumcision Daily Monitor http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Former-inmates-decry--forced-circumcision/-/688334/2110502/-/1wm3ydz/-/index.html Accessed: 2013-12-16. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ltvm2Hi9
Llewellyn, E (2012) Infant Circumcision: A Tipping Point for HIV Prevention USAID Frontlines May/June 2012 Full-text available at http://transition.usaid.gov/press/frontlines/fl_may12/FL_may12_U5_SWAZILAND.html Accessed: 2012-06-17. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68U9lv9vt
Mbanje, P (2013) Zimbabwe government takes circumcision into the classroom The Standard http://www.thestandard.co.zw/2013/12/08/zimbabwe-government-takes-circumcision-classroom/ Accessed: 2013-12-16. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LtvSfy7N
Mhlanga, P (2012) Govt sharpens knives for forced circumcision NewsDay 1 December 2012 Full-text available at http://www.newsday.co.zw/2012/12/01/govt-sharpens-knives-for-forced-circumcision/
News24 (2013) Minister urges MPs to get circumcised News24 website http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Politics/Minister-urges-MPs-to-get-circumcised-20131022 Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ltunawpb
NIH (2008) Male Circumcision and HIV Rates in Kenya ClinicalTrials.gov website 28 May 2008 Full-text available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00059371
NIH (2007) Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Rakai, Uganda ClinicalTrials.gov website 23 August 2007 Full-text available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00425984
Ngwega, N (2012) Tanzania: Handeni Promotes Male Circumcision to Curb HIV Spread allAfrica.com 11 February 2012 Full-text available at http://allafrica.com/stories/201302110873.html
OHRP (2011) Regulatory Changes in ANPRM Comparison of Existing Rules with Some of the Changes Being Considered Office of Human Research Protections website Full-text available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/anprmchangetable.html Accessed: 2012-01-16. Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/64jh4cWek
OIG (2011a) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract HHSN266-2006-00015C With NexBio, Inc. (A-03-10-03119) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 21 September 2011 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003119.pdf
OIG (2011b) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract HHSN272-2008-00013C with the EMMES Corporation (A-03-10-03115) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 31 October 2011 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003115.pdf
OIG (2011c) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract N01-AI-15416 With the University of California at San Francisco Audit (A-03-10-03120) on the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 10 July 2011 Available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003120.pdf
OIG (2011d) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract N01-AI-3-0052 With Avecia Biologics Limited (A-03-10-03117) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 21 September 2011 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003117.pdf
OIG (2011e) Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Oversight of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds for Fiscal Years 2007 Through 2009 (A-04-10-04006) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 15 June 2011 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region4/41004006.pdf
OIG (2012a) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract HHSN266-2005-00022C With PPD Development, LP (Audit A-03-10-03118) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 14 September 2012 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003118.pdf
OIG (2012b) Appropriations Funding for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract N01-AI-30068 With PPD Development, LP (Audit A-03-10-03116) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 14 September 2012 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region3/31003116.pdf
OIG (2013a) Data and Safety Monitoring Boards in NIH Clinical Trials: Meeting Guidance, But Facing Some Issues (Report OEI-12-11-00070) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 28 June 2013 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-12-11-00070.pdf
OIG (2013c) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Namibia Office Did Not Always Properly Monitor Recipients' Use of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds Audit (A-04-12-04020) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 19 November 2012 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region4/41204020.pdf
OIG (2013d) The Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Did Not Always Manage the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds or Meet Program Goals in Accordance With Award Requirements (Audit A-04-12-04019) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 19 November 2012 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region4/41204019.pdf
OIG (2013b) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's South Africa Office Did Not Always Properly Monitor Recipients' Use of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds (Audit A-04-12-04022) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 12 February 2013 Full-text available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region4/41204022.pdf
OIG (2013e) National Health Laboratory Service Did Not Always Manage President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds or Meet Program Goals in Accordance With Award Requirements (Audit A-05-12-00024) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 15 August 2013 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/51200024.pdf
OIG (2013f) The South African National Department of Health Did Not Always Manage President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds or Meet Program Goals in Accordance With Award Requirements (Audit A-05-12-00022) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 23 August 2013 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/51200022.pdf
OIG (2013g) Aurum Institute for Health Research Did Not Always Manage President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds or Meet Program Goals in Accordance With Award Requirements (Audit A-05-12-00021) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 23 August 2013 Full-text available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/51200021.pdf
OIG (2013h) The Vietnam Administration for HIV/AIDS Control Did Not Always Manage the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds or Meet Program Goals in Accordance With Award Requirements (Audit A-06-11-00057) Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General website 10 June 2013 Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2013-06-10-hhs-oig-vietnam.html
Okwii, E (2013) Mbale Residents Flee Forceful Circumcision Uganda Picks 24 June 2013 Accessed: 2015-10-02. Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2013-06-24-uganda-picks-mbale-residents.html
Onyango, H (2012) Kenya: The Cut for Boys to Tame HIV allAfrica Accessed: 2015-10-02. Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2012-05-10-allafricacom-kenya-cut-for.html
Otieno, S (2013) Met to get cash, food prizes for circumcision The Star 22 July 2013 Accessed: 2015-10-02. Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2013-07-22-star-kenya-met-to-get-cash.html
Towindo, L (2012) Were we fooled? The Sunday Mail 13 July 2012 Accessed: 2015-10-01. Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2012-07-13-sunday-mail-zimbabwe-were-we.html
ZimEye (2013) Zimbabwe Buys Into Controversial Israeli Style Circumcision ZimEye Accessed: 2015-10-01. Archived by Bodily Autonomy Watch at http://bodilyautonomywatch.blogspot.com/2015/10/2013-11-10-zimeye-zimbabwe-buys-into.html
Saturday, 26 September 2015
2015-09-27 Eyewitness News (South Africa) - "EC authorities meet to curb initiation deaths"
Excerpt:
Archived URL: https://archive.is/7Wb8F
CAPE TOWN - Authorities in the Eastern Cape will today start a two-day summit aimed at curbing initiation deaths.
Officials rescued 23 initiates, some as young as 13-years-old from illegal schools in several villages near Mthatha earlier this week.
It is off season and normally young people don't go for circumcision until the school holidays.
During the winter season more than 30 young boys died, most of them from the Eastern Cape while undergoing the rite of passage.
...
Two months ago 158 children were rescued from an illegal school near Tzaneen after community members reported suspicious activity.
Government said it is looking to clamp down on illegal schools by possibly introducing new legislation.
Archived URL: https://archive.is/7Wb8F
Friday, 25 September 2015
2015-09-25 Kisumu County News (Kenya) - Nascop to launch second national circumcision strategy in Kisumu
Excerpt:
URL: http://www.hivisasa.com/kisumu/health/81591
The National Aids and STI Control Programme (Nascop) is set to launch the second edition of the National Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) strategy in Kisumu on Friday.
The second national VMMC Strategy which covers from 2014-2019 will be launched at the Tom Mboya Labour College.
The secretary of the Inter Counties Task Force on VMMC, Isaac Oguma said in a statement that the strategy will guide in the implementation of VMMC activities for a five-year period.
...
As a result of this program, the national coverage of male circumcision has increased from 85 percent in 2007 to 91 percent in 2012 against a national target of 94%.
In Kisumu County alone, nearly 200,000 males are targeted during the second phase.
URL: http://www.hivisasa.com/kisumu/health/81591
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)